American Journal of Water Science and Engineering

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

Defluoridation of Groundwater by Activated Carbon Derived from Water Hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes) by Phosphoric Acid Activation

Elevated concentration of fluoride in groundwater poses serious health concerns in communities that depend on the groundwater for their drinking water. Efforts to develop appropriate defluoridation techniques have experienced challenges such as low efficiency, unaffordability, skill shortage, and cultural perceptions. This study evaluated the use of water hyacinth-derived activated carbon as an indigenous, environment-friendly, and socio-economically acceptable alternative technique for defluoridation. Dried water hyacinth stems were impregnated with concentrated phosphoric acid to three times their weight, and then calcinated in a muffle furnace by increasing the temperature at a rate of 5°C /min up to 600°C. The produced WHAC was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), proximate analysis and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Batch experiments determined effects of pH, contact time and adsorbent dosage on defluoridation efficiency. The results revealed a bulk density of 0.123 g/cm3, ash content 8.9% and fixed carbon content 66.7%. These characteristics were comparable to those of selected commercial activated carbons (CACs). The ash content was less than 10% and fixed carbon greater than 65%, suggesting high surface area and porosity that are indicative of a good quality activated carbon. The SEM revealed a rough and irregular texture illustrating high porosity. The WHAC achieved a fluoride removal efficiency of 82.6%, at pH 3 and contact time of 120 min. Fluoride adsorption by WHAC was best described by Freundlich isotherm model with a correlation factor (R2) of 0.952 and an adsorption intensity (n) of 0.285 that indicated heterogeneity of the WHAC. The adsorption was described by pseudo-second order kinetic model with a correlation factor (R2) of 0.999 and comparable experimental and theoretical adsorption capacities of 0.4608 and 0.4656, respectively, which suggested chemisorption adsorption of fluoride onto WHAC.

Defluoridation, Activated Carbon, Groundwater, Water Hyacinth, Adsorption, Isotherm

APA Style

Mugambi Muchunku, E., Kuria Ndiba, P., Auma Omondi, E. (2023). Defluoridation of Groundwater by Activated Carbon Derived from Water Hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes) by Phosphoric Acid Activation. American Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 9(4), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.12

ACS Style

Mugambi Muchunku, E.; Kuria Ndiba, P.; Auma Omondi, E. Defluoridation of Groundwater by Activated Carbon Derived from Water Hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes) by Phosphoric Acid Activation. Am. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2023, 9(4), 97-107. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.12

AMA Style

Mugambi Muchunku E, Kuria Ndiba P, Auma Omondi E. Defluoridation of Groundwater by Activated Carbon Derived from Water Hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes) by Phosphoric Acid Activation. Am J Water Sci Eng. 2023;9(4):97-107. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.12

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Anisuzzaman, S. M., Joseph, C. G., Taufiq-Yap, Y. H., Krishnaiah, D., & Tay, V. V. (2015). Modification of commercial activated carbon for the removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol from simulated wastewater. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 27 (4), 318–330.
2. Aslam, M. M. A., Kuo, H.-W., Den, W., Sultan, M., Rasool, K., & Bilal, M. (2022). Chapter 10—Recent trends of carbon nanotubes and chitosan composites for hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous samples. In S. Ahuja (Ed.), Separation Science and Technology (Vol. 15, pp. 177–207). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90763-7.00006-8
3. Bansal, R. C., & Goyal, M. (2005). Activated carbon adsorption. Taylor & Francis.
4. Budianto, A., Kusdarini, E., Effendi, S. S. W., & Aziz, M. (2019). The Production of activated carbon from Indonesian mangrove charcoal. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 462, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/462/1/012006
5. CCEFW. (2010). Excess fluoride in water: report of the consultative committee Kenya Bureau of Standards. KeBS.
6. Cherono, F., Mburu, N., & Kakoi, B. (2021). Adsorption of lead, copper and zinc in a multi-metal aqueous solution by waste rubber tires for the design of single batch adsorber. Heliyon, 7 (11), e08254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08254
7. Deetae, P., & Wongpromrat, P. (2019). Study of atrazine adsorption kinetics by using an activated carbon synthesised from water hyacinth. E3S Web of Conferences, 116.
8. Dickinson, R., & Royer, F. (2014). Weeds of North America. University of Chicago Press.
9. Doczekalska, B., Bartkowiak, M., Orszulak, G., & Katolik, Z. (2015). Activated carbon from plant materials. Ann. WULS - SGGW, For. and Wood Technol., 92, 88–91.
10. Doczekalska, B., Bartkowiak, M., Waliszewska, B., Orszulak, G., Cerazy-Waliszewska, J., & Pniewski, T. (2020). Characterization of chemically activated carbons prepared from miscanthus and switchgrass biomass. Materials, 13 (7), 1654.
11. Elazab, H., & Ibrahim, K. (2019). Methylene blue removal using water hyacinth derived active carbon. Lambert Academic Publishing.
12. Emmanuel, K. A., Ramaraju, K. A., Rambabu, G., & Rao, A. V. (2008). Removal of fluoride from drinking water with activated carbons prepared from HNO3 activation—a comparative study. Rasayan J. Chem., 1 (4), 802–818.
13. Fawell, Bailey, K., Chilton, J., Dahi, E., Fewtrell, L., & Magara, Y. (Eds.). (2006). Fluoride in drinking-water. IWA Pub.
14. Gaurav, G. K., Mehmood, T., Cheng, L., Klemeš, J. J., & Shrivastava, D. K. (2020). Water hyacinth as a biomass: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122214.
15. Gayathri, G., Raju, K., Dinesh, S., & Beulah, M. (2017). Defluoridation of groundwater using low cost adsorbents.pdf. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 10 (5).
16. Gevera, P., Mouri, H., & Maronga, G. (2018). High fluoride and dental fluorosis prevalence: A case study from Nakuru area, The Kenyan Rift Valley. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 1422.
17. Habuda-Stanić, M., Ravančić, M., & Flanagan, A. (2014). A Review on Adsorption of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution. Materials, 7 (9), 6317–6366.
18. Isichei, T., & Okieimen, Felix. (2014). Adsorption of 2-Nitrophenol onto water hyacinth activated carbon-kinetics and equilibrium studies. Environment and Pollution, 3 (4), p99.
19. Johnson, P. J., Setsuda, D. J., & Williams, R. S. (1999). Activated carbon for automotive applications. Carbon Materials for Advanced Technologies (pp. 235–268). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008042683-9/50010-8
20. Joshi, S., & Pokharel, B. P. (2014). Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from Lapsi (Choerospondias axillaris) seed stone by chemical activation with potassium hydroxide. Journal of the Institute of Engineering, 9 (1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.3126/jie.v9i1.10673
21. Kahama, R. W., Kariuki, D. N., Kariuki, H. N., & Njenga, L. W. (1997). Fluorosis in children and sources of fluoride around Lake Elementaita region of Kenya. Fluoride, 30 (1), 19–25.
22. KNBS. (2019). Kenya housing and population census: Volume iv; distribution of population by socio-economic characteristics. Government of Kenya.
23. Koehlert, K. (2017). Activated carbon: Fundamentals and new applications. Cabot Corp.
24. Kut, K. M. K., Sarswat, A., Srivastava, A., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2016). A review of fluoride in African groundwater and local remediation methods. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2 (3), 190–212.
25. Kwiatkowski, J. F. (Ed.). (2012). Activated carbon: classifications, properties and applications. Nova Science Publishers.
26. Mahamadi C. (2012). Water hyacinth as a biosorbent: A review. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5 (13).
27. Manikannan, K., Abraham, M. K., Karthick Raja Namasivayam, S., Raji, V. R., Raj, S., & Moovendhan, M. (2022). Removal of fluoride from water by natural biosorbents and evaluation of microstructure and functional groups in removal process. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03588-6
28. Mariah, M. A. A., Rovina, K., Vonnie, J. M., & Erna, K. H. (2023). Characterization of activated carbon from waste tea (Camellia sinensis) using chemical activation for removal of methylene blue and cadmium ions. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 44, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2023.01.007
29. Martínez-Mendoza, K. L., Barraza Burgos, J. M., Marriaga-Cabrales, N., Machuca-Martinez, F., Barajas, M., & Romero, M. (2020). Production and characterization of activated carbon from coal for gold adsorption in cyanide solutions. Ingeniería e Investigación, 40 (1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.80126
30. Marwa, J., Lufingo, M., Noubactep, C., & Machunda, R. (2018). Defeating fluorosis in the east African rift valley: transforming the Kilimanjaro into a rainwater harvesting park. Sustainability, 10 (11), 4194.
31. Maulina, S., & Iriansyah, M. (2018). Characteristics of activated carbon resulted from pyrolysis of the oil palm fronds powder. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 309, 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/309/1/012072
32. Mestre, A. S., Viegas, R. M. C., Mesquita, E., Rosa, M. J., & Carvalho, A. P. (2022). Engineered pine nut shell derived activated carbons for improved removal of recalcitrant pharmaceuticals in urban wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 437, 129319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129319
33. Metcalf & Eddy. (2002). Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse (G. Tchobanoglous & H. D. Stensel, Eds.). McGraw-Hill Education.
34. Mobeen, N., & Kumar, P. (2017). Defluoridation techniques—a critical review. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 10 (6), 64.
35. Mohapatra, M., Anand, S., Mishra, B. K., Giles, D. E., & Singh, P. (2009). Review of fluoride removal from drinking water. Journal of Environmental Management, 91 (1), 67–77.
36. Nandiyanto, A., Oktiani, R., & Ragadhita, R. (2019). How to Read and Interpret FTIR Spectroscope of Organic Material. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 4, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v4i1.15806
37. Nipun. (2015, August 3). Difference between absorbance and transmittance. Pediaa.Com. Retrieved March 22, 2023, from https://pediaa.com/difference-between-absorbance-and-transmittance/
38. Omondi, E. A., Ndiba, P. K., & Njuru, P. G. (2019). Characterization of water hyacinth (E. crassipes) from Lake Victoria and ruminal slaughterhouse waste as co-substrates in biogas production. SN Applied Sciences, 1 (8), 848.
39. Omondi, E. A., Ndiba, P. K., Chepkoech, K., & Kegode, A. (2023). Modeling anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth with ruminal slaughterhouse waste for first order, modified gompertz and logistic kinetic models. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 12, 569–580. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.52775
40. Patil, S., & Ingole, N. (2012). Studies on defluoridation: A critical review. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies.
41. Petersen-Perlman, J., Megdal, S., Gerlak, A., Wireman, M., Zuniga-Teran, A., & Varady, R. (2018). Critical issues affecting groundwater quality governance and management in the United States. Water, 10 (6), 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060735
42. Poudyal, M. (2015). Investigation on the efficiencies of low-cost adsorbents for the treatment of fluoride contaminated water. Kathmadu University Press.
43. Poudyal, M., & Babel, S. (2015). Removal of fluoride using granular activated carbon and domestic sewage sludge. International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Application, 82.
44. Riyanto, C. A., & Prabalaras, E. (2019). The adsorption kinetics and isoterm of activated carbon from water hyacinth leaves (Eichhornia crassipes) on Co(II). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1307 (012002).
45. Salifu, A. (2017). Fluoride removal from groundwater by adsorption technology: the occurrence, adsorbent synthesis, regeneration and disposal (1st ed.). CRC Press.
46. Tarapitakcheevin, P., Weerayutsil, P., & Khuanmar, K. (2013). Adsorption of acid dye on activated carbon prepared from water hyacinth by sodium chloride activation. GMSARN International Journal, 7 (2013), 83-90.
47. Telkapalliwar, N. G., & Shivankar, V. M. (2019). Data of characterization and adsorption of fluoride from aqueous solution by using modified Azadirachta indica bark. Data in Brief, 26, 104509.
48. Uddin, M. T., Islam, M. S., & Abedin, M. Z. (2007). Adsorption of phenol from aqueous solution by water hyacinth ash. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2 (2), 11–17.
49. Vojnović, B., Cetina, M., Franjković, P., & Sutlović, A. (2022). Influence of initial pH value on the adsorption of reactive black 5 dye on powdered activated carbon: kinetics, mechanisms, and thermodynamics. Molecules, 27 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041349
50. Wambu, E. W., & Muthakia, G. (2011). High fluoride water in the Gilgil area of Nakuru County, Kenya. Fluoride, 44 (1), 37–41.
51. WASREB. (2016). Drinking water quality and effluent monitoring guideline. Water Services Regulatory Board.
52. WHO. (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed + 1st add). World Health Organization.
53. Yakout, S. M., & El-Deen, S. (2016). Characterization of activated carbon by phosphoric acid activation of olive stones. Aranian Journal of Chemistry, 9, 1155–1162.
54. Yapo, N. S., Aw, S., Briton, B. G. H., Drogui, P., Yao, K. B., & Adouby, K. (2022). Removal of fluoride in groundwater by adsorption using hydroxyapatite modified Corbula trigona shell powder. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 12, 100386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100386